In Summation - The Final Word
av Paul Townsend
Nyeste episode
New York v. McCray, Richardson, Salaam, Santana, and Wise (The…
New York v. McCray, Richardson, Salaam, Santana, and Wise (The…
Om denne podkasten
Attorney, host and creator Paul Townsend examines some of the most famous and infamous - and often misunderstood - court cases to make headlines across America. In doing so, he provides listeners with a true and unbiased understanding of the underlying facts as the judge or jury would have heard them at the time, explains what the role of each party was, breaks down the legal arguments presented, and gives the final word on who ultimately prevailed and why.
Episoder
De 20 nyeste av 72 episoder
- New York v. McCray, Richardson, Salaam, Santana, and Wise (The Central Park Five) · 1 t 7 min · Episode 69In any criminal justice system, there is bound to be abuse. No system is perfect, not even close. But the case discussed in this episode is one of the most egregious…
- Idaho v. Daybell AND Arizona v. Daybell · 58 min · Episode 68Hello Listeners and Friends, In this installment of In Summation, we discuss the Doomsday Mom, Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman who serves as proof that religious extremism is…
- United States v. Sean Combs (Puff Daddy/P. Diddy/Diddy/Brother Love) · 57 min · Episode 67Welcome back! The wait for a new episode is over. In a triumphant return, Paul breaks down the federal case against Sean "Diddy" Combs. Combs was charged with RICO, sex…
- California v. Orenthal James Simpson · 1 t 36 min · Episode 66OJ Simpson's arrest and trial captivated the country. Dubbed the "trial of the century," the 1995 spectacle grabbed eyeballs with gavel to gavel coverage for approximately 10…
- In Summation Explains: Collateral Estoppel · 6 minLawyers, like other professionals, tend to use a lot of industry terms which don't make sense to the average person. Sometimes, those terms pop up in artcles and media describing…
- In Summation Explains: Decriminalization vs. Legalization · 5 minWelcome back. In this brief episode, Paul digs into the difference between the terms decriminalization and legalization. They are frequently used interchangeably by people who do…
- In Summation Explains: No Harm No Foul, Right? · 9 minIn the second installment of In Summation Explains, Paul explains what happens when someone undoes the wrong they caused before they get caught, and whether that is a defense to…
- In Summation Explains: Habeus Corpus · 12 minWhat does habeus corpus mean? how does it work? what does it actually do? In this new segment of In Summation, Paul explains specific legal terms and areas of law which confuse…
- New York v. Daniel Penny · 1 t 10 min · Episode 65In this episode, recurring guest Adam Uris and I discuss the recent New York prosecution of Daniel Penny, the 24 year old marine corps veteran who killed Jordan Neely on the…
- Georgia v. Jeffery Williams (aka Young Thug) (part 2) · 39 min · Episode 64Hello All, At the end of October there was a whirlwind of activity in the Young Thug trial down in Fulton County Georgia. All of a sudden, in the span of one week, multiple…
- Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's Corporation (The Hot Coffee Case) · 45 min · Episode 63The wait is over and In Summation - The Final Word is back. At the request of a listener (thanks Ben!), in this episode we tackle a case which has really become THE case that…
- Georgia v. Jeffery Williams (aka Young Thug) · 1 t 2 min · Episode 62Hello Loyal Listeners, In Summation returns with a thorough explanation of one of the most truly absurd cases to take place in recent memory. Rapper/Hip Hop artist Young Thug…
- United States v. Donald Trump (The FEDERAL Election Interference Case) · 1 t 20 min · Episode 61At this point, it's become difficult to keep track of all the different places that former (and possibly future) President Donald Trump has been indicted. To recap: he has been…
- Michigan v. Jennifer Crumbley (Prosecuting the Parents of a Killer) · 51 min · Episode 60Hello everyone, I've missed you. Due to a confluence of factors which I won't waste time or energy going into here, we had a slightly longer hiatus than I expected, but we are…
- Idaho v. Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik · 53 min · Episode 58Welcome Back Listeners! In this episode of In Summation, Paul discusses a horror movie turned real life. Inspired by the 1996 horror classic, Scream, Brian Draper and Torey…
- United States v. Lori Loughlin, et al. (Varsity Blues Scandal) · 52 min · Episode 57Remember Full House? Remember how wholesome and family-friendly it was? Remember Aunt Becky? She was married to Uncle Jesse. She was part of that wave of television which…
- California v. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Doggy Dogg) · 52 min · Episode 56The 1990's were filled with high profile criminal trials for some of the most famous entertainers in the world. Michael Jackson and OJ Simpson headlined a list of extremely…
- Illinois v. August Spies, Albert Parsons, et al. (The Haymarket 8) · 1 t 4 min · Episode 55Hello again friends and family, Bucking a recent trend of recent cases, today we head back roughly 140 years to Chicago in the 1880s. This is another case where a person or…
- Florida v. Jamell Demons (YNW Melly) · 57 min · Episode 54Greetings friends of In Summation - The Final Word. Today's episode explores the unusual trial of Jamell Demons, aka YNW Melly, who was charged with the double murder of his…
- Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen · 53 min · Episode 53Welcome back one and all. In this installment of In Summation - The Final Word, Paul breaks down one of the elements of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause. Generally…
